July 2026 – Page 5 – Medico Legal

When Should an Expert Say, “I Cannot Answer That”?

The most dangerous answer an expert gives is not always the wrong one. Sometimes it is the answer that should never have been attempted.
I have seen experts cope with a difficult question by talking for several minutes, moving gradually away from their own discipline while hoping that confidence will conceal the gap. It rarely does. A good barrister will let the answer continue. By the time the expert stops, the original uncertainty has become a question about judgement.

shelley
July 14, 2026
0 Comments
10 Views

Latest Latest UK

The 2015 Rehabilitation Code in Practice

A claimant can have a carefully prepared schedule of loss, several respectable expert reports and no meaningful rehabilitation plan. By the time treatment is finally discussed, symptoms may have become established, employment may have been lost, and the family may have reorganised itself around disability.
That is the practical failure the 2015 Rehabilitation Code was designed to prevent.

shelley
July 14, 2026
0 Comments
11 Views

Latest Latest SA UK

Failure to Disclose Conflicts of Interest

The conflict usually appears at the worst possible moment.
The report has been disclosed, costs have been incurred and the expert may already have attended a conference with counsel. Then, in cross-examination, somebody asks:
“You previously worked with the defendant, did you not?”
The relationship may be innocent. It may have ended years earlier and may have had no influence on the opinion. None of that prevents the damage. The issue is no longer only whether the expert was biased. It is why the connection was not disclosed and whether the court can now trust the expert’s judgement.

shelley
July 14, 2026
0 Comments
10 Views

Latest UK

Chronic Whiplash Carries a Significant Economic Burden

When whiplash-related neck injuries fail to resolve, the consequences extend far beyond the healthcare system. Persistent symptoms can reduce an individual’s ability to work, increase reliance on disability benefits, and generate substantial long-term costs for employers, insurers, and governments.

shelley
July 14, 2026
0 Comments
7 Views

Latest Latest Latest UK

Whiplash Prognosis and MedCo Reforms: Why the Recovery Period Became the Battleground.

In many whiplash reports, the most important sentence is not the diagnosis. It is the prognosis.
A claimant may report neck pain, stiffness, headaches or shoulder symptoms following a road traffic accident. The expert may diagnose whiplash or soft tissue injury. In lower-value claims, however, the harder question is often how long the symptoms lasted or are likely to continue.

shelley
July 14, 2026
0 Comments
8 Views

AU Latest Latest UK

The Cost of Psychological Injury to UK Employers

Psychological injury at work is no longer simply a welfare issue shared between HR and occupational health. It is a business, legal and increasingly medico-legal risk.
Physical workplace injuries tend to receive an immediate response. A fall or fracture may produce an incident report, photographs, witness statements and formal investigation. Psychological injury is different. It often develops quietly and may first appear as absence, reduced performance, fatigue, conflict, sleep disturbance or disengagement. By the time it is recognised, the employee may already be off work, the records incomplete and the dispute entrenched.

shelley
July 13, 2026
0 Comments
9 Views

AU Latest Latest Latest SA UK

Should Psychological Symptoms Be Assessed Earlier in Whiplash Claims?

I have seen too many whiplash reports where the psychological symptoms appear as an afterthought.
The claimant describes neck pain, stiffness and headaches. The report records range of movement, treatment, medication and prognosis. Then, near the end, there is a short line about travel anxiety, disturbed sleep or nervousness in a car. Sometimes that line is enough. Often it is not.

shelley
July 13, 2026
0 Comments
15 Views

Latest Latest SA UK

Why Prognosis Has Become the Most Important Question in Modern Whiplash Claims.

Diagnosis used to dominate whiplash litigation. Today, prognosis often matters more.
That shift reflects a fundamental change in how low-value road traffic injury claims are assessed. Under the modern compensation framework, the value of many whiplash claims is tied directly to the anticipated duration of symptoms. In practical terms, this means the most influential question is often no longer whether a claimant suffered a whiplash injury. It is how long the injury is expected to last.

shelley
July 13, 2026
0 Comments
13 Views

Latest UK

Why Are Low-Impact Claims Often Disputed by Insurers?

Low-impact claims are disputed because the accident may be easy to prove, but the injury is harder to explain.
That is the central tension in this corner of personal injury litigation. A claimant may have been involved in a genuine road traffic accident. Liability may not be seriously contested. The vehicles may have touched. There may be photographs, repair records and a clear account of the collision. Yet the insurer may still dispute the claim because the reported injury appears disproportionate to the apparent force involved.

shelley
July 13, 2026
0 Comments
14 Views

Latest UK

The Link Between Chronic Pain and Psychological Distress.

I have seen reports fail because the expert treated pain and distress as separate problems.
The claimant had persistent pain. The records also showed low mood, poor sleep, anxiety and loss of confidence. The report separated the physical and psychological symptoms as though they belonged to different people. That is rarely how chronic pain works.

shelley
July 10, 2026
0 Comments
13 Views

01

02

03

Contact Info

01

02

03

Month: July 2026

About Us

Quick Link

Top Categories

Top Posts